![]() CylanceProtect features a "proactive defense" model, as opposed to the reactive one of other solutions, that pretty much "clean up the mess" once the damage is done. I have been using it for a year and have only got two warnings so far: one for an old file from a temp folder that had not been picked up by the previous antivirus, and a false positive (CCleaner.exe, oddly). * The artificial intelligence system for detection is changing the way attacks are predicted.Īn antivirus solution that just works without getting in your wayĪ well protected workstation! No viruses, trojans, exploits, or other threats in the network I use at work.ĬylanceProtect performs its work so silently you almost forget it is there. * It is possible to use this versatile tool in different devices separately for the protection of memory, control of scripts, control applications and review of sites with possible threats. ![]() * It offers practicality, stability and fidelity by keeping tasks in constant execution and pre-programmed, which helps the user to increase their efficiency in time and evaluation of reports to maintain an accurate control in the company and to be able to handle better security routines. * Its compact and user-friendly system can be integrated with third-party applications for the administration or maintenance of network units. ![]() * Warns, evaluates and saves an exact description of the point of origin, expanding the ability to isolate the affected or involved teams during the attack. * It is an excellent application because it is based on an artificial intelligence system, which makes it a predictive, fast and efficient unit when detecting an intrusion before reaching its final point. I do not have negative aspects, since it is a very well elaborated software, with guarantees of feasibility and adaptation in each company. Primal application to detect and prevent attacks in your organization. It has certain restrictions to folders or files with full control from the "everyone" security group. The initial setup is different than traditional AV, you must run it in test mode to catch false positives and whitelist scripting folders. It is more expensive than traditional AV, but it's the most important security function on any system. it's ram/processor footprint is incredibly small and is very easy to install. Another big bonus is you don't run background scans, Cylance runs one initial background scan and then only scans realtime items when they open. It can dissect what a program is going to do based on an AI algorithm and determine before it runs if it is malicious. ![]() Upon installing Cylance, we have not had a single infection. We suffered from infections that were detected after it was too late, such as ransomware, since there is a lag between the release of malware and the updated signatures to detect them. The problem with signature based solutions is they can be easily defeated. Previously our organization used Trend Micro for our AV solution. Very Positive, I believe this is the future of antivirus/antimalware. I guess that's why the marketing initiatives can seem a little over the top, it's hard to get the idea across when some hater says "doesn't detect EICAR!" That's why my MSP pal doesn't have his SMB clients on this product, they can't comprehend the value proposition of something so different to what they're familiar with. In comparison to traditional signature-based (useless) AV, CylancePROTECT and CylanceOPTICS seems expensive. The endpoint is the focus of the last line of defense, so PROTECT is critical in my security posture. I don't see these attacks in my environment, hence the testing. When I throw attacks against old-build agents, and those attacks are obliterated, it helps me sleep better at night. He has had many clients compromised by ransomware, several more than once, with nuke/pave/restore for the entire organization being the typical response. I have tested the Cylance client against true zero day attacks, not recognized on VirusTotal, shared with me by an MSP friend. In the three years we've been protecting our endpoints with CylancePROTECT, we have had ZERO incidents across ~250 endpoints. With three years experience and NO compromised endpoints, I can focus on other security layers instead of faffing around fixing endpoints. Even with excellent email filtering, which we also have, there are just too many things that can go horribly wrong. With a traditional AV client that includes web filtering, which we also have, I would consider those endpoints EXTREMELY vulnerable. I have a significant number of users out in the field with limited or no edge protection, so a cloud based endpoint solution is an obvious first step. Ignore the marketing hype, for endpoint protection this is the real deal
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |